Why brake changes decide long races
Designing a component around how quickly it can be replaced.
Brake changes decide long races because brake pads and sometimes discs wear down over a long enough distance regardless of how well they were designed, making a pit stop for brakes essentially inevitable, and once that stop is unavoidable, the time it costs is decided almost entirely by how quickly the component was designed to be accessed and replaced rather than by how the car performs on track.
Wear that is planned for from the start
Brake pad wear is predictable and expected, so a worn pad in a long race counts as a scheduled event, unlike a part that breaks without warning. The real design question is how much time the replacement is allowed to cost. An assembly with easy access, little bodywork to remove and a caliper that lets a pad slide out and a fresh one slide in without disturbing anything else turns an unavoidable stop into a short one. The same braking performance from an assembly designed purely around stopping power, with no thought for how a mechanic reaches the pads mid-race, turns it into a long one.
Quick-release skewer or wheel nut
Changing a flat bicycle tyre at the roadside shows the trade plainly. A wheel held by a quick-release skewer comes off and goes back on by hand with no tools. The identical wheel held by nuts needs a spanner of the right size and more fumbling to start and tighten each nut, though once fitted both wheels are held equally firmly. The difference lies entirely in the time the change takes, fixed by a design choice made long before anyone was standing at the roadside in a hurry.
Thirty seconds a stop, four stops a race
Suppose one car's brake change takes thirty seconds longer than a rival's because of a panel to unbolt and a caliper that has to come off first. Over a race with four brake stops, that is two minutes, more than half a lap on a circuit where a lap takes three and a half minutes, and a driver would need to find half a second a lap for well over two hundred laps to claw it back. So a design review for an endurance car's brakes includes, alongside stopping power and heat capacity, a timed rehearsal of the pad change, since an access path that looks reasonable on a drawing can still cost unplanned seconds once a mechanic tries it under pressure.
The same arithmetic governs the choice of pad material. A compound giving slightly more friction but wearing faster can force an extra stop, and a whole extra stop, including slowing into the pit lane and rejoining, almost always costs more than the small on-track advantage the grippier pad bought. Balancing stopping power against wear life is decided before the race starts, since finding out partway through costs a stop.
In a sprint race short enough that the pads never approach their wear limit, none of this applies. With no service stop to design around, effort spent on mid-race access is wasted, and the discipline of designing for a fast service only earns its cost once the race is long enough for that stop to arrive.